Posts Tagged ‘bank’
Part 5
This is the most heavily suppressed video on Youtube. In it, Dr David Ayoub provides mountains of factual medical evidence to prove autism is caused by thimerosal mercury in the baby vaccines. In one chart, David shows how the vaccine companies could be forced to pay $100 billion in lawsuit claims if this evidence is brought into court.
$100 billion is a vast sum of money. Now we wonder, what would these vaccine companies do to try to protect that $100 billion?
http://www.safetylawsuits.com/
Duration : 0:10:0
It seems like there’s so many guys out there with extra time on their hands, not knowing what to do.
Well, how about filing lawsuits against the govt to make helpful changes in society? Then make a “haul” video showing the successful court orders that made those helpful changes.
Some of my federal lawsuit work is posted here
http://www.safetylawsuits.com/
FREE LAWSUIT KIT
You can get a free federal lawsuit kit by writing to any federal court house. Address the letter to the court clerk, include your name and address, and ask for a “free pro se lawsuit kit”. The lawsuit kit includes all the forms you need to file your own lawsuit in federal court. Just be honest and kind, obey the law, and you should have no problem with the lawsuit. 
The Constitution allows you to act as your own attorney in any lawsuit you have. Just write the words “pro se” after your name on the court documents.
When you file a lawsuit “pro se” acting as your own attorney, the court grants you all the rights and privileges of a real attorney for your case.
Duration : 0:9:20
Part 3
This is the most heavily suppressed video on Youtube. In it, Dr David Ayoub provides mountains of factual medical evidence to prove autism is caused by thimerosal mercury in the baby vaccines. In one chart, David shows how the vaccine companies could be forced to pay $100 billion in lawsuit claims if this evidence is brought into court.
$100 billion is a vast sum of money. Now we wonder, what would these vaccine companies do to try to protect that $100 billion?
http://www.safetylawsuits.com/
Duration : 0:9:59
Part 7
This is the most heavily suppressed video on Youtube. In it, Dr David Ayoub provides mountains of factual medical evidence to prove autism is caused by thimerosal mercury in the baby vaccines. In one chart, David shows how the vaccine companies could be forced to pay $100 billion in lawsuit claims if this evidence is brought into court.
$100 billion is a vast sum of money. Now we wonder, what would these vaccine companies do to try to protect that $100 billion?
http://www.safetylawsuits.com/
—————————————-
GUIDELINES FOR BASIC MORAL EDUCATION
People who follow these guidelines do very well
http://www.safetylawsuits.com/guide-b…
—————————————-
HOW TO AVOID A NERVOUS BREAKDOWN
http://www.safetylawsuits.com/tips-ac…
Duration : 0:9:47
Amity Shlaes challenges the received wisdom that the Great Depression occurred because capitalism broke and that it ended because FDR, and government in general, came to the rescue. According to Shlaes, it was the government that made the Great Depression worse. And was FDRs progressivism, as evident in the New Deal, really all that new, or was it a step along a progressive continuum that already had been established?
Duration : 0:34:40
www.safetylawsuits.com/
John Taylor, President & CEO of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC), appearing on CNN’s Lou Dobbs to discuss the lawsuit against Countrywide Financial brought by a group of investors.
Duration : 0:2:17
This is a sarcastic comedy video.
Is it really a good idea to privatize America’s police depts, as Republican extremists have been advising for many years?
Lawrence Kudlow of CNBC has for years been promoting the privatization of every part of the government. If this occurs, it will strip away any rights you and I have as citizens because we have no say in what a private corporation does.
http://kudlow.com/
In Washington DC, Republican organizations accept money from the big NWO corporations to promote the ludicrous view of having private corporations run America’s police depts and jails.
If this is allowed, it will mean the New World Order corporations will begin pushing out the American govt and replacing it with the companies that they themselves own and run.
Privately-owned police depts are unconstitutional.
Any citizen can file a federal lawsuit to try to have these private police depts deemed unconstitutional and forbidden.
The Constitution allows you to act as your own attorney in any lawsuit you have. Just write the words “pro se” after your name on the court documents you type up.
FILING YOUR OWN LAWSUIT
You can get a free federal lawsuit kit by writing to any federal court house. Address the letter to the court clerk, include your name and address, and ask for a “free pro se lawsuit kit”. The lawsuit kit includes all the forms you need to file your own lawsuit in federal court. Just be honest and kind, obey the law, and you should have no problem with the lawsuit.
The federal rules showing how to file a lawsuit are
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, at
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/
Duration : 0:3:52
Part 3
This is the most heavily suppressed video on Youtube. In it, Dr David Ayoub provides mountains of factual medical evidence to prove autism is caused by thimerosal mercury in the baby vaccines. In one chart, David shows how the vaccine companies could be forced to pay $100 billion in lawsuit claims if this evidence is brought into court.
$100 billion is a vast sum of money. Now we wonder, what would these vaccine companies do to try to protect that $100 billion?
I myself recently filed an anti-vaccine lawsuit in federal court USDNJ #09-3803.
http://www.safetylawsuits.com/
Duration : 0:9:59
Predatory Lenders’ Partner in Crime
How the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers
By Eliot Spitzer
Thursday, February 14, 2008; A25 The Washington Post
Several years ago, state attorneys general and others involved in consumer protection began to notice a marked increase in a range of predatory lending practices by mortgage lenders. Some were misrepresenting the terms of loans, making loans without regard to consumers’ ability to repay, making loans with deceptive “teaser” rates that later ballooned astronomically, packing loans with undisclosed charges and fees, or even paying illegal kickbacks. These and other practices, we noticed, were having a devastating effect on home buyers. In addition, the widespread nature of these practices, if left unchecked, threatened our financial markets.
Even though predatory lending was becoming a national problem, the Bush administration looked the other way and did nothing to protect American homeowners. In fact, the government chose instead to align itself with the banks that were victimizing consumers.
Predatory lending was widely understood to present a looming national crisis. This threat was so clear that as New York attorney general, I joined with colleagues in the other 49 states in attempting to fill the void left by the federal government. Individually, and together, state attorneys general of both parties brought litigation or entered into settlements with many subprime lenders that were engaged in predatory lending practices. Several state legislatures, including New York’s, enacted laws aimed at curbing such practices.
What did the Bush administration do in response? Did it reverse course and decide to take action to halt this burgeoning scourge? As Americans are now painfully aware, with hundreds of thousands of homeowners facing foreclosure and our markets reeling, the answer is a resounding no.
Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye.
Let me explain: The administration accomplished this feat through an obscure federal agency called the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). The OCC has been in existence since the Civil War. Its mission is to ensure the fiscal soundness of national banks. For 140 years, the OCC examined the books of national banks to make sure they were balanced, an important but uncontroversial function. But a few years ago, for the first time in its history, the OCC was used as a tool against consumers.
In 2003, during the height of the predatory lending crisis, the OCC invoked a clause from the 1863 National Bank Act to issue formal opinions preempting all state predatory lending laws, thereby rendering them inoperative. The OCC also promulgated new rules that prevented states from enforcing any of their own consumer protection laws against national banks. The federal government’s actions were so egregious and so unprecedented that all 50 state attorneys general, and all 50 state banking superintendents, actively fought the new rules.
But the unanimous opposition of the 50 states did not deter, or even slow, the Bush administration in its goal of protecting the banks. In fact, when my office opened an investigation of possible discrimination in mortgage lending by a number of banks, the OCC filed a federal lawsuit to stop the investigation.
Throughout our battles with the OCC and the banks, the mantra of the banks and their defenders was that efforts to curb predatory lending would deny access to credit to the very consumers the states were trying to protect. But the curbs we sought on predatory and unfair lending would have in no way jeopardized access to the legitimate credit market for appropriately priced loans. Instead, they would have stopped the scourge of predatory lending practices that have resulted in countless thousands of consumers losing their homes and put our economy in a precarious position.
When history tells the story of the subprime lending crisis and recounts its devastating effects on the lives of so many innocent homeowners, the Bush administration will not be judged favorably. The tale is still unfolding, but when the dust settles, it will be judged as a willing accomplice to the lenders who went to any lengths in their quest for profits. So willing, in fact, that it used the power of the federal government in an unprecedented assault on state legislatures, as well as on state attorneys general and anyone else on the side of consumers.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783_pf.html
Duration : 0:3:50